This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Beasley, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Beasley, A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Breastfeeding Studies: Culture, Biomedicine, and Methodology

27 Chilton Grove, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

The research and literature focusing on aspects of human lactation and infant feeding are dominated by a biomedical orientation. This paper posits that such a manner of delimiting the data to be acquired and analysed represents a peculiarly Western mode of thought. An overview and classification of the types of cultural studies on human lactation and infant feeding confirms the domination of a biomedical approach to the subject and allows the identification of areas which have received little attention. Thus many English language cultural studies of breastfeeding by employing this same methodology against different cultural backdrops offer little or no fresh knowledge or insight into that culture's view of breastfeeding.

Key Words: Biomedicine • culture • methodology • review • epistemology

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Schmied and L. Barclay Connection and Pleasure, Disruption and Distress: Women's Experience of Breastfeeding J Hum Lact, December 1, 1999; 15(4): 325 - 334. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. W. Leff, M. P. Gagne, and S. C. Jefferis Maternal Perceptions of Successful Breastfeeding J Hum Lact, June 1, 1994; 10(2): 99 - 104. [Abstract] [PDF]

				U.E. MacIntyre and A R P Walker Lactation - How Important is it? The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, February 1, 1994; 114(1): 20 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]